© Glendon Mellow, The Flying Trilobite

Anatomy of a Frequently-Asked Question

[This column also appears in the April 16 edition of Humanist Network News.]


by Dale McGowan


In a recent article in USA Today (“Am I raising ‘atheist children’?”, March 17), author Nica Lalli addressed a common question for nonreligious parents: “How would you respond if one of your children became religious?” As the topic went rippling through the nonreligious blogosphere, both the consensus inside nonreligious parenting and the false assumptions outside of it were revealed in comment threads.

Like so many questions we hear, the way it is asked is at least as revealing as any answer. Sometimes I can barely hear the question itself for the clatter of the thrown gauntlet. The tone of the question often implies that all my high-minded claims of parental openness are a self-deluding sham—that hearing that one of my kids had chosen to identify with religion would cause me to fly into an icon-smashing, garment-tearing, child-disowning rage, well before the child had reached the stirring refrain of “Jesus Loves Me.”

There’s a strong consensus among nonreligious parents against putting worldview labels on our children or guiding them by the nose into our own. It’s not unanimous; some of the blog comments I’ve seen since Nica’s piece made me wince, like the atheist mother who said she would not “let” her child identify with religion. Fortunately, no hot or staining beverages were in my mouth when I read that. Let? Let? I’m not even sure what that means. But that view is happily rare. Most of us are more committed to parenting our children toward genuine autonomy than churning out rubber stamps of ourselves.

One of the many problems with the question is the implication that religious identification is a single point of arrival, like the day a young adult’s daemon takes a fixed form in His Dark Materials or palms begin flashing red in Logan’s Run. Did it work that way for you—or did you pass through a number of stages and try on a number of hats along the way? I thought so. And see what a lovely person you turned out to be.

A close relative of mine went through a period of experimentation with different worldviews. After being a fairly conventional New Testament Christian for a while, she became something of a Manichaean dualist, believing the world was divided into good and evil, darkness and light. She eventually went through a sort of Einsteinian-pantheist phase before adopting a benevolent, utilitarian humanism.

Then she turned six.

I encourage my kids to try on as many beliefs as they wish and to switch back and forth whenever they feel drawn toward a different hat, confident that in the long run they will be better informed not only of the identity they choose, but of those they have declined. Were I to disown my kids each time they passed through a religious identity, I’d have to keep a lawyer on retainer.

Now let’s get specific. My child has become “religious,” you say. Is it “Love-your-neighbor” religious…or “God-hates-fags” religious? “Four Chaplains” religious…or “9/11 hijackers” religious? Dalai Lama…or Jerry Falwell?

Adding to the difficulties is the almost comic range of meaning of “religion.” A good friend of mine has verses from the Book of Psalms scrolling around the walls of his bedroom and believes that Jesus Christ is the son of God and the sole path to salvation—yet describes himself as “not at all religious, really.” Then you have the Unitarians—the majority of whom are nontheistic—who tend to insist, sometimes downright huffily, that they are religious.

Just as troubling as the idea that I’d protest any and all religious expressions in my children is the notion that I’d applaud any and all nonreligious outcomes. Though many of the most ethical and humane folks I’ve known have been nonreligious, some of the most malignant and repugnant SOBs have been as well. So, then: Is it “Ayaan Hirsi Ali” nonreligious—or “Joe Stalin” nonreligious?

Perhaps you can see why I consider the question, “What if your child becomes religious?” as unanswerably meaningless as, “What if your child becomes political?”

I have three compassionate, socially conscientious, smart, ethical kids, with every indication of remaining so. If they choose a religious expression, it’s likely to be one that expresses those values. They might become liberal Quakers, or UUs, or progressive Episcopalians, or Buddhists, or Jains, framing their tendency toward goodness and conscience in a way different from but entirely respectable to my own way of seeing things. We could do far worse than a world of liberal Quakers.

If instead one of my kids were to identify with a more malignant religion, I’d express my concerns in no uncertain terms. But the consequences of the belief would be the main point of contention, not the fact that it is “religious.” And my love for my child, it goes without saying, would be reduced by not so much as a hair on a flea on a neutrino’s butt.



This was written on Wednesday, 16. April 2008 at 08:40 and was filed under belief and believers, diversity, My kids, nonbelief and nonbelievers, Parenting, values. You can keep up with the comments to this article by using the RSS-Feed.

You can leave a Comment, or Trackback.

«  –  »

Comments »

  1. Dale – as usual, you’ve hit the nail on the head with this piece. I particularly like the way you’ve summed it up with: “But the consequences of the belief would be the main point of contention, not the fact that it is “religious.””

    Labels always seem to get in the way of true understanding – whether gay, black, Islamic, athiest, or even evolutionist or, I suppose, creationist. Of course, labels are a way of identifying people as part of a larger group and there is some usefulness in this, especially when we self-identify. Others then can generally have some idea about one’s background, worldviews, values, etc. The problem seems to stem from folks mistaking the label for the person – a sort of can’t-see-the-trees-for-the-forest myopia. Or from making a hard-and-fast value judgment based solely on the label. To be overly simplistic, there are “good” and “bad” people of every ilk – being black, or gay or Christian doesn’t affect that.

    Comment: Jim Lemire – 16. April 2008 @ 10:07 am

  2. […] how they treat others that counts. I was reminded of this once again this morning when I read the latest post from Dale McGowan, who says to let them find their own way more eloquently than I ever could. filed under: religion, […]

    Pingback: the gookins dot net » Blog Archive » finding their own way – 16. April 2008 @ 12:15 pm

  3. Once again I’m so impressed with your writing abilities. If I were more articulate, I’d expound. Thanks for continuing to share with us.

    Comment: Karen – 16. April 2008 @ 4:19 pm

  4. […] http://parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220So, then: Is it “Ayaan Hirsi Ali” nonreligious—or “Joe Stalin” nonreligious? Perhaps you can see why I consider the question, “What if your child becomes religious?” as unanswerably meaningless as, “What if your child becomes political? … […]

    Pingback: Ayaan Hirsi Alis goings on » Blog Archive » What others have been saying about ayaan hirsi ali – 16. April 2008 @ 4:43 pm

  5. Dale,
    This is so good.
    After laughing at the …”Then she turned six.”…line, I proceeded to applaud the, “Is it Love-Your-Neighbor” religious?…” part of the post.
    I have grown weary of the “you are either ‘on’ or ‘off’ ” nature of discussions of religion.
    This post makes it clear that the discussion is so much more, and far more interesting…

    Comment: leslie – 16. April 2008 @ 7:02 pm

  6. Wonderful post.

    My daughter is 9 1/2 and has made me proud, on many occasions, with her free thinking abilities. Just recently, after being told by a teacher that she was a miracle (born at 25 weeks) and that “God saved her for a reason” she replied with, “No, medicine saved me.” The size of my smile conveyed the pride that was in my heart.

    A few days later she told a relative (who is very religious) that she doesn’t know what she believes because she “hasn’t had ample time to do the research.” (yes, she really is only 9)

    I guess my point here is that kids will explore and I am certainly not going to be judgmental towards her and possibly close the door of communication. We all know that someone with opposing views will be there to scoop her up.

    Comment: Stacy – 21. April 2008 @ 1:57 pm

  7. […] children. (See Real Live Preacher’s Soft True Strong & You and The Memeing of Life post Anatomy of a Frequently-Asked Question if you’re […]

    Pingback: Children Church Beliefs at Stellenbosch Gemeente – 03. June 2008 @ 6:14 am

  8. … [Trackback]…

    I wish to show my thanks to the creator of this website. Keep contributing a good concepts and strategies. Many people will surely develop their knowledge by reading blogs like this….

    Trackback: bolsas de papel – 21. January 2012 @ 1:44 pm

  9. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More Infos here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220 […]…

    Trackback: kupferpreise – 26. February 2012 @ 3:28 pm

  10. Look here for more:…

    […]I am no longer certain the place you’re getting your information, but great topic.[…]…

    Trackback: senuke x review – 29. February 2012 @ 3:23 am

  11. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More Infos here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220 […]…

    Trackback: photovoltaik – 09. March 2012 @ 12:27 am

  12. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More Infos here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220 […]…

    Trackback: games – 11. March 2012 @ 10:15 pm

  13. …Click here for or more Information…

    […]I am now not sure where you are getting your info, however good topic.[…]…

    Trackback: Abraham – 12. March 2012 @ 8:05 pm

  14. Look there for more:…

    […]you make blogging glance[…]…

    Trackback: Aicha – 18. March 2012 @ 10:06 am

  15. …Click here for or more Information…

    […]The total glance of your site is great, let smartly as the content![…]…

    Trackback: mannequin agence – 23. March 2012 @ 12:46 am

  16. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220 […]…

    Trackback: casino – 16. April 2012 @ 12:16 pm

  17. Wood Blinds…

    Dreary day It was a dreary day here today, so I just took to piddeling around online and found…

    Trackback: Blinds More Info – 18. April 2012 @ 10:10 am

  18. Me and my friend have been arguing about an matter comparable to this! Now I realize that I used to be appropriate. lol! Thank you to the data you article….

    What a good resource!…

    Trackback: Cheap Air Jordans – 18. April 2012 @ 12:29 pm

  19. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=220 […]…

    Trackback: the diet solution program review – 19. April 2012 @ 7:37 pm

  20. Hi, in which did you get this details can you please help this with some proof or you may possibly say some excellent reference as I and others will actually enjoy. This details is actually excellent and I will say will always be useful if we try it …

    I would like to thank you for your endeavors you’ve created in publishing this write-up. I am trusting the same finest function from you inside the future as well. In fact your fanciful writing abilities has inspired me to start my personal website no…

    Trackback: Monster Studio – 24. April 2012 @ 2:28 am

  21. Thanks! it is useful to me!…

    It really is very good to possess the capability to examine a very good high quality article with valuable information on topics that plenty are fascinated on. The stage that the facts indicated are all initial hand on reside experiences even support f…

    Trackback: Monster Solo – 24. April 2012 @ 3:14 am

  22. Fantastic website, many thanks a whole lot for your awesome posts!…

    Yes, thank for your data a million! Must find anyone organizing Tea Party. I would like to participate in organizing….

    Trackback: Dr Dre Beats Pro – 24. April 2012 @ 4:42 am

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.