générique cialis meilleur prix viagra generique suisse viagra le moins chers achat cialis france commande viagra en france viagra indien prix viagra officiel france forum viagra gratuit acheter générique viagra acheter viagraz pas cher cialis sans ordonnance acheter viagra sans ordonnance achat viagra original levitra 20mg generique levitrat
  • clomid compresse levitra genericos kamagra barato acquisto kamagra oral jelly levitra priser achat cialis inde levitra acquisto tarif cialis 20mg viagra vente libre france cialis generico online italia cialis achat internet comprar cialis em portugal propecia vente en ligne prezzi finasteride vente levitra
  • cialis zonder recept 
    prezzo cialis 10 mg 
    viagra remboursé 
    viagra op recept 
    precios levitra farmacias andorra 
    commander du viagra proffesionel sur internet 
    achats cialismg 
    cialis venta 
    acheter viagra sans ordonnance 
    prezzo viagra 50 mg 
    pris cialis 
    achat viagra en ligne pas cher 
    viagra cialis con master card on line 
    acheter silagra en ligne 
    cialis commander 

    © Glendon Mellow, The Flying Trilobite

    Most many likely fairly tend

    memingwordleRegular readers will know that I like me a good condensation — wordclouds (like this one, for this blog), concordances…anything that can boil a book down to its essence are my friends. Saves all that actual reading, don’t ya know.

    In 2007 I compared the concordances (lists of the 100 most often used words) from What the Bible Says About Parenting and Parenting Beyond Belief. That the former, written from a conservative religious perspective, included the words SIN, DUTY, EVIL, FEAR, AUTHORITY, DISCIPLINE, COMMAND, COMMANDMENT, SUBMIT, and LAW in its top 100, while PBB had not a single one of those (and instead had things like REASON, QUESTION, and IDEA) is as telling as any other analysis.

    I also mentioned at the time that both books had GOD in the top three. If you think it’s surprising to mention God a lot in a nonreligious parenting book, consider that the top four words in Quitting Smoking for Dummies are SMOKING, SMOKE, TOBACCO, and CIGARETTES.

    This week I began wondering what words would end up in the top 100 of Atheism for Dummies. Because I’m working in 21 separate chapter documents, I haven’t done a scan yet, but I have a guess.

    ATHEIST and the other labels will be up there, of course, as will GOD, our very own cigarette. But I’m willing to bet that qualifiers like MOST, MANY, LIKELY, FAIRLY, and TEND will also be in the top 100. That’s because it’s damn nigh impossible to speak in absolute terms about who atheists are, how they behave, or what they believe beyond the definitional thing. So I end up saying MOST atheists consider X to be true, atheists TEND to be Y, a given atheist is LIKELY to also be Z.

    Obviously there’s variety in every worldview, but at least others can USUALLY point to a canon of presumed beliefs and practices, even if adherents diverge from them in the uh, real world.

    (Eighteen days to go.)

    If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.



    This was written on Friday, 26. October 2012 at 09:53 and was filed under The Dummies Diary. You can keep up with the comments to this article by using the RSS-Feed.

    Du hast die Möglichkeit einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.

    «  –  »

    Comments »

    1. The diversity of thought among atheists is no surprise, given the enormity of that umbrella. On the theist side, though, I’ve been surprised at how diverse thought has seemed, in my anecdotal experience, to have become, and also to be simply ALLOWED, within, say, Christian denominations. (Of course, this is more true the more liberal-ish the denomination and far less true the more right-leaning the church or institution.)
      It seems as though theological and political ideas that not too long ago would have been met with something between shunning and stake-burning are now tolerated or at least spoken of in tones above a whisper. I wonder if my personal sense of this corresponds with any more objective data?
      And if I’m right, I wonder if this might be more because of the increasing visibility of contrary views through electronic and other media, or just because modernity itself, science / technology in particular, is slowly eroding the saleability and plausibility of traditional theological ideas? Or could it be that as traditional theology must attract increasingly credulous people, increasingly bizarre ideas and ideologies naturally seem more credible and acceptable to those who continue holding to the old notions, too?

      Comment: Brad – 29. October 2012 @ 10:01 am

    2. 21 chapter documents… out of interest, what software are you using for writing?

      Comment: macronencer – 29. October 2012 @ 10:07 am

    3. @macro: Plain old Word, with (interestingly) macros. The publisher provides templates that have made life MUCH easier.

      Comment: Dale – 29. October 2012 @ 2:07 pm

    Leave a comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.