© Glendon Mellow, The Flying Trilobite

What’s your frequency, Jehovah?

It’s been a hoot this week watching various progressive bloggers (including myself) trying to stop writing about the situation tragicomedy that is the Palin nomination. Slightly more worrisome is the growing awareness that desperation, with all of its likely dark strategies, is overtaking the GOP.

So let me say goodbye to this riveting political week with some calm, cerebral meta-analysis from the New York Times. After which I promise not to mention the name Sarah Palin ever again. Or at least until the Earth has traveled fully 1.6 million miles through space.

I blogged about concordances about a year ago, noting that the frequency of words used in a book can say a lot (though not everything) about a book. (Harp music and wavy lines…)

Below are concordances for two parenting books, with the 100 most common words in order of frequency (in batches of ten for easier reading). One is about raising kids using biblical principles; the other is about raising kids without religion. See if you can tell which is which, and whether the concordances reveal anything about content, approach, and tone:

BOOK A

1-10: children—parents—god—child—love—own—husband—family—lord—word
11-20: wife—teach—heart—sin—christ—father—need—life—things—even
21-30: kids—should—man—must—son—proverbs—parenting—mother—does—scripture
31-40: kind—wisdom—evil—first—church—shall—may—home—fear—authority
41-50: marriage—obey—christian—ephesians—law—work—right—come—principle—means
51-60: take—truth—wives—woman—time—true—good—himself—solomon—give
61-70: live—men—let—paul—role—society—duty—honor—commandment
71-80: obedience—responsibility—teaching—against—gospel—know—therefore—verse—discipline—people
81-90: submit—something—themselves—jesus—want—women—wrong—world—day—think
91-100: instruction—faith—always—attitude—command—ing—certainly—spiritual—genesis—now

BOOK B

1-10: children—god—parents—religious—time—people—child—good—things—life
11-20: family—religion—world—think—believe—secular—know—even—beliefs—may
21-30: years—questions—own—right—kids—human—death—reason—first—school
31-40: idea—need—day—should—ing—moral—see—live—want—new
41-50: book—help—now—find—say—take—work—answer—others—something
51-60: church—come—wonder—bob—values—age—friends—get—go—little
61-70: does—without—long—often—true—thinking—feel—stories—must—love
71-80: exist—part—give—important—really—animals—two—great—kind—might
81-90: humanist—best—look—seems—still—atheist—few—thought—mean—mind
91-100:kobir—different—though—meaning—experience—problem—always—fact—adults—ceremony

Book A is
wtbsap

Book B is
pbb

The first observation is among the most interesting: that these two books, though different in many, many ways, have the same top three words. Even more interesting is that the secular parenting book mentions God more often. Not entirely surprising if you think about it. The top four words in Quitting Smoking for Dummies are SMOKING, SMOKE, TOBACCO, and CIGARETTES.

I went on to note that the religious parenting book used words related to OBEDIENCE 22 times more often (relative to total word count) than the nonreligious parenting book.

Now the New York Times has created a graphic concordance for the principal speeches in the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, selecting 23 “big theme” words or phrases common to speeches at both events, and it’s equally revealing.

The most common of the selected words for the Democrats? CHANGE, which was heard 89 times per 25,000 words. Most common Republican word? GOD, at 43 times per 25K. (For all their pragmatic pandering to religion, Democrats could only muster half as many references to Jehovah — 22.)

Second of concern to the GOP from the list is TAXES (42), followed by CHANGE (30), BUSINESS (30), and ENERGY (26). BUSH was mentioned only seven times per 25,000 words, and the phrase “FOUR MORE YEARS,” for some inexplicable reason, not even once.

Ten of the words were in the mouths of Democrats more often than GOD. Second to CHANGE was MCCAIN (78), followed by ENERGY (49) and BUSH (46). And the phrase “FOUR MORE YEARS” occurred 14 times on this scale.

Okay. That’s it — the last installment of my tangent into politics. Next time it’s back to parenting, humanism, critical thinking, and Sarah Palin.

Dammit.

[See the complete Times graphic here.]

This was written on Friday, 05. September 2008 at 07:42 and was filed under Uncategorized, church-state separation. You can keep up with the comments to this article by using the RSS-Feed.

You can leave a Comment, or Trackback.

« Thinking by druthers 5 – Somebody bring me a mirror »

6 Comments »

  1. After watching parts of the RNC, I’m surprised their top phrases weren’t “POW” and “broken bones”. For the love of Pete they talked about almost nothing else. As if surviving terrible times makes for good presidential material.

    This election is bizarre.

    Comment: jessicalbm – 05. September 2008 @ 10:32 am

  2. If you look at the top ten for each party a very disturbing pattern emerges. While it bugs me that the Republicans mentioned God som much, it bugs me even more that the second most mentioned word by the democrats was McCain and the fourth most was Bush. While the Republicans mentioned five different words more than the word Obama. That says to me that the democrats have no solutions to offer just a lot of complaining about the opposition party. Why couldn’t they talk about energy, jobs, health care, economy, war, etc. more than they complained about McCain. This scares me greatly. To be fair, I didn’t watch any of the speeches so I don’t know the context but I don’t like the trend that you see from this graphic.

    Comment: jcornelius – 05. September 2008 @ 12:02 pm

  3. To be fair, I didn’t watch any of the speeches so I don’t know the context but I don’t like the trend that you see from this graphic.

    I’d definitely suggest you see the speeches before letting a concordance scare you greatly.

    Though there were certainly swipes at McCain’s policies, several of the Dems (including Obama) also specifically honored McCain’s military service and character (”I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain,” “John McCain has worn the uniform of our country with bravery and distinction, and for that we owe him our gratitude and respect,” etc.) — which adds to the count but isn’t attacking him. Other issues also skew the counts, such as Palin’s use of “our opponent” (8 times) instead of “Obama” (once).

    I offer the concordances as interesting, but by themselves they don’t clinch anything for better or worse.

    Comment: Dale – 05. September 2008 @ 12:38 pm

  4. I agree that the concordance is more a point of interest than anything else. I will have to check out the speaches. As I said, without seeing them I have no idea of the context.

    Comment: jcornelius – 05. September 2008 @ 1:36 pm

  5. I think you are smart to skip the televised speeches. I felt myself being very emotionally affected by the visuals and passionate delivery. I will continue to watch them this year, mostly because I don’t think there is any chance I could get my 10 year old to read them, but at least he will sit in front of the TV with me. Next time around, though, we’ll be reading them.

    Comment: jessicalbm – 05. September 2008 @ 9:53 pm

  6. [...] old switcheroo This is at least the fifth time I’ve written about my love of artful distillation. Analogies, concordances, wordclouds, graphics, video mashups [...]

    Pingback: The Meming of Life » The old switcheroo Parenting Beyond Belief on secular parenting and other natural wonders – 02. February 2010 @ 2:07 pm

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.