© Glendon Mellow, The Flying Trilobite

Happy Birthday, Earth Kids! (Sorry Uncle Sam’s missing the party, but they wouldn’t let us kill you)

UNCRCOn November 20, 1989, the UN General Assembly adopted into international law the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), one of the most important and progressive documents since the invention of kids. Children born on that day finished childhood today — happy birthday, kids! — having grown up under the most comprehensive set of child protections in human history.

The CRC laid out a set of universal rights for children. Governments of countries that have ratified the CRC are required to report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child periodically to be examined on their progress with regards to child rights in their country as specified in the Convention. In the course of eighteen years, the CRC has revolutionized child welfare around the world.

The language is simple and clear: The best interests of children must be the primary concern in making decisions that affect them. Children have the right to be protected from being hurt and mistreated, physically or mentally. They have the right to a free primary education. They should be protected from all forms of sexual exploitation, abuse, abduction, sale and trafficking. Governments must do everything they can to protect and care for children affected by war, and children under 15 should not be forced or recruited to take part in a war or join the armed forces. Stuff like that.

190 UN member countries have ratified the convention either partly or completely. Only two countries on Earth have not: Somalia and the United States.

At the time of the Convention, Somalia was riven by civil war, which may explain their failure to ratify. But what about the U.S.? Why can’t the U.S. sign a simple and effective human rights guarantee for children that is universally acceptable to the rest of the (non-Somali) world, from England to Syria to Iraq to Japan? Because American religious and political conservatives of the time saw a winning issue and organized opposition that continues to this day.

Yes, dear reader, I’m winding up a small rant. Please turn down the volume on your computer.

U.S. religious and political conservatives in the early 90s led by Pat Buchanan torpedoed our ratification of the CRC by organizing a storm of fear and ignorance. Article 14 of the Convention, Buchanan said, would forbid religious parents from raising their kids in their family faith tradition.

Here’s Article 14 in full:

1. States Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

2. States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to provide direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child.

3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

Freedom of thought. Freedom of conscience. Freedom of religion. I should have known Satan was in on this!

The Vatican ratified the convention, for crying out loud, as did Saudi Arabia, Iran, and a number of other explicitly religious countries. None of them saw any threat of losing their religion, and there’ve been precious few children ripped from the arms of their devout parents by UN peacekeepers. But American conservatives are unrivaled when it comes to manipulating our fears. As a result, the U.S. stands head and shoulders above the rest of the world in our ability to fearfully wet ourselves over nothing.

The other problem for religious and political conservatives was Article 37a:

(a) No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age.

Those bastards wanted to take away our national right to execute children! Why, they can pry the lethal injection syringe out of my cold dead hands. If pot-smoking hippie cultures like Saudi Arabia and Iran want to give their kids permission to run wild, that’s their business. Our civilization depends on our ability to kill and imprison children.

(*Sigh*)

Look, I know I’m sounding shrill. I hate that, I really do. I’d much rather provide light entertainment, but this kind of thing makes me feel like the top of my head is coming apart, and I don’t know how else to react. I’m exhausted from embarrassment over our collective decisions and actions as a nation. It just goes on and on. And when the international community is trying like mad to improve things for the next generation and the most privileged country on Earth can’t bother to join in…surely it matters enough to shout about.

Anyway, Happy Birthday to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Thanks for the invitation. I wish like hell we could have been there.


UNICEF information page about the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

Full text of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

A paper on religious conservatives’ objections to the CRC

U.S. organizations endorsing the CRC
, including many religious groups

What individuals can do to encourage U.S. and Somali ratification of the Convention

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

comments

This was written on Tuesday, 20. November 2007 at 16:30 and was filed under belief and believers, diversity, Kerfuffles, morality, nonbelief and nonbelievers, values. You can keep up with the comments to this article by using the RSS-Feed.

You can leave a Comment, or Trackback.

«  –  »

Comments »

  1. Are you kidding me!? At least with the Kyoto Protocol I can potentially, possibly, maybe understand the rationales for non-ratification. But this is beyond comprehension. Actually and unfortunately, this sort of thing is surprising me less and less.

    Thanks for this eye-opening rant.

    Comment: Jim Lemire – 23. November 2007 @ 11:38 am

  2. Ah, thanks for that comment, Jim! I worry every time I rant about these larger social issues that I’m inducing nothing but rolled eyes. But some things just cry out for outrage, and this is one of them for me.

    Comment: Dale – 23. November 2007 @ 1:19 pm

  3. Dale, the “Status of Ratifications” list shows both Somalia and the USA as “signatories” to the CRC. What does that mean exactly, and where does it stand in relation to ratification?

    Comment: Theo – 27. November 2007 @ 6:18 pm

  4. The executive signs it; the legislature ratifies it into law.

    During the Clinton Administration, Madeline Albright signed the CRC. But in order for it to take the force of law, Congress had to ratify. By the time we signed — 1995, I believe — the Republican Party controlled Congress and had issued a public declaration called the “Contract With America.”

    One of the items in the “Contract” was the National Security Restoration Act, a huge self-righteous chest-thumping poke-in-the-eye to the UN which sought to prevent U.S. troops from serving under United Nations command unless the president determines it is necessary for the purposes of U.S. national security AND to drastically cut U.S. payments for UN peacekeeping operations.

    Clinton knew that there was no earthly point sending the CRC to that Congress for ratification, so he denied it the opportunity to grandstand and distort it further. Then GW Bush took over, and even the White House lost the desire to see it ratified.

    Anyhoo, more than you asked, but there it is.

    Comment: Dale – 27. November 2007 @ 6:27 pm

  5. I found your blog today and have been addicted from the start. I think that the reason why the Republicans were so against ratifying this treaty was that it could put a crimp on the Religious Right’s ability to beat their children (I grew up in one of those homes). I remember the local fundamentalist community’s outrage that the US might make ‘spanking’ illegal. Never mind the fact that spanking doesn’t work long term. They might not get to beat their kids and that would, of course, be the end of the world as we know it.

    Love the posts so far.

    Comment: seabhag – 20. August 2008 @ 4:05 pm

  6. Thanks! Yes, I’m also convinced that is the reason — or perhaps the larger outrage of “foreigners” telling us how to raise our children.

    Comment: Dale – 20. August 2008 @ 4:48 pm

  7. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=147 […]…

    Trackback: Homepage – 17. January 2012 @ 10:32 pm

  8. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=147 […]…

    Trackback: my homepage – 18. January 2012 @ 10:18 pm

  9. The Meming of Life…

    Thanks a lot. You’re seriously questioning why the most suitable metropolitan area all over the world is Atlanta, you have to look into this. Have you heard what ever they fabricated right there a year ago? Do you view the images and photos? You must …

    Trackback: portarollo – 17. February 2012 @ 12:15 am

  10. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=147 […]…

    Trackback: cosmetic surgeryc osts – 24. February 2012 @ 9:06 pm

  11. … [Trackback]…

    […] Read More here: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=147 […]…

    Trackback: elektrik – 25. February 2012 @ 2:00 pm

  12. …Recent Blogroll Additions…

    […]I am now not sure where you are getting your info, however good topic.[…]…

    Trackback: senuke x – 01. March 2012 @ 1:07 pm

  13. … [Trackback]…

    […] There you will find 74463 more Infos: parentingbeyondbelief.com/blog/?p=147 […]…

    Trackback: photowatt – 09. March 2012 @ 2:39 am

  14. Find more there:…

    […]The entire glance of your web site is wonderful, let well as the content![…]…

    Trackback: Aissatou – 12. March 2012 @ 6:04 am

  15. …Take a look for more Information on that topic…

    […]Excellent blog here! Also your site so much up fast![…]…

    Trackback: Alexi – 17. March 2012 @ 10:18 pm

  16. …Take a look for more Information on that topic…

    […]The total glance of your site is great, let smartly as the content![…]…

    Trackback: mannequin photo – 22. March 2012 @ 12:04 pm

  17. Thanks for that well-thought post. I��m actually at work correct now! So I have to go off without reading all I��d like. But, I put your weblog on my RSS feed so that I can study much more….

    I would like to thank you for that endeavors you have made in publishing this post. I am trusting the same greatest work from you within the future as well. In fact your fanciful writing abilities has inspired me to start my own weblog now. Truly the b…

    Trackback: Juicy Couture Uk – 19. April 2012 @ 10:27 pm

  18. Okay content. I merely found out your web site and wished to say I’ve genuinely liked reading through your thoughts. By any implies I��ll be subscribing in your feed and I genuinely hope you article once more quickly….

    That is genuinely good news. Thank you for discussing it with us!…

    Trackback: Kobe Bryant Shoes – 20. April 2012 @ 2:14 am

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.